crunched for time today so i won’t be posting photos yet from some of the other shoots… lots of editing and other work to do around the house in prep for our anniversary mini-vacation this weekend. i’ll start posting the other shoots tomorrow and throughout the rest of this week… but today is gwen & jen 2, the extended shoot version. :)
i normally don’t post on fridays, but i’ll be in williamsburg, va tomorrow at busch gardens… and i certainly don’t think i’ll be blogging from any roller coasters. :) i’ll be back on sunday to dive head first into the next several months worth of shoots, editing, client meetings, etc. time flies. i wish i could say that i would be taking pictures at the park tomorrow, but i won’t. and as strongly as i believe in the “take your camera everywhere with you” adage, i really think amusement parks should be left out for two reasons:
i want to be thinking of nothing but “waaaaaaaaaaah” when i am on a roller coaster instead of “waaaaaaaaah oh no i hope my camera is okay waaaaaaaaah.”
so have a wonderful weekend and i’ll see you on sunday.
there are several photographs i’ve taken over the years that remind of movies. they were never intentionally taken for that purpose, but i instantly think of the movie now and can no longer separate the two:
the royal tenenbaums:
she and her brother richie ran away from home one winter and camped out
in the african wing of the public archives.
the big lebowski:
smokey, this is not ‘nam. this is bowling. there are rules.
alice in wonderland:
Caterpillar: By the way, I have a few more helpful hints. One side will make you grow taller…
Alice: One side of what?
Caterpillar: …and the other side will make you grow shorter.
Alice: The other side of what?
Caterpillar: THE MUSHROOM, OF COURSE!
so in the age old question, which one is it? does life imitate art or does art imitate life? i am most certainly inclined to believe that art imitates life. first there was life – art came afterward. right? maybe not. but that’s how i tend to think of it. i certainly believe that that’s how it began, although some people live their lives as though imitating movies, desperate housewives, etc. now. but originally, art definitely imitates life. do you agree or disagree?
but of course, as illustrated above, art also imitates art. it can be intentional or unintentional, but it still happens. the works of others are inspiring or, in some cases, so uninspiring (or just outdated) that we feel compelled to create a new and improved version. sometimes we are awesome at that (the new star trek movie) or we fail miserably (i really wanted to like the new willy wonka, but it became painfully clear within the first scene of the movie that we were in for the longest and most painful 115 minutes of our lives).
typically photography is one of the few art forms where you are trying to capture real life in candid moments. of course, we also pose our subjects and often pose, frame, and edit in artsy ways. photographers make a habit of imitating life and imitating art simultaneously. we want it to be real, but we also want it to be creative and artsy. but then again there are different types of photographers…
it gets a bit confusing, doesn’t it. i guess that’s why it’s one of the age old questions.
the one photograph i have that i can truly say best represents art imitating life:
every christmas we have a town underneath our tree. in the past it has been full of victorian mansions, castles, quaint coffee shops, unique mom and pop shops, etc… until last year when we found a ceramic wal-mart and decided that it absolutely had to be placed under the tree. so last christmas all of the tiny shops barely surviving in this economy lost their business, as you can see above, when all of the townspeople made a mad dash for the wal-mart (note the bus parked outside and the sniper on the roof). now all we need is a cereamic mcdonalds with a mccafe and christmas tree town will be complete!…until Sal, the last survivng monster town cat after Button and Tang, goes on a rampage and destroys the city the next morning. but i guess that doesn’t happen in real life, does it. kind of a shame considering a giant monster cat would be awesome and we could all use one less wal-mart.
